有趣的判決 兒女監護權 ~轉載

晶晶

A man and his wife were getting a divorce at a local court, but the custody of their children posed a problem.

一對夫妻到地方法院去辦離婚，但是孩子的監護權是個爭執問題。
6 \- T9 H. b+ C/ W- G$ }
The mother jumped to her feet and protested to the judge that since she had brought the children into this world, she should retain custody20of them. The man also wanted custody of his children, so the judge asked for his side of the story.
/ O& L) \+ m( \
這母親跳腳說孩子是她親生的，當然是她才擁有監護權。而先生也想爭取，所以法官也請他說說理由看看。

$ X+ y# X+ y0 H( \! I$ g- `/ h+ @After a long moment of silence, the man rose from his chair and replied:'Judge, when I put a dollar into a vending machine,
; K2 \5 Y! W$ u2 band a Pepsi comes out, does the Pepsi belong to me or to the machine?'
1 V4 w( S- e" s3 C# p
經過長時間的沉寂，然後男人站起來回答說：
0 M* y; w# i' |) j+ r
& g* N, P0 J- J9 D( ^0 l& g「法官大人！當我把一塊錢塞進自動販賣機，
然後滾出一瓶百事可樂來，難道這可樂會屬於那部機器的嗎？」
% M1 B/ y) @; Q4 p5 U2 h
9 E, h: c# n$ J% @7 d1 t6 `/ ?Don't laugh, he won!
" j  E5 V* T0 d+ ?別笑！他贏了。
* M- o; L# O: H3 m# m
1 }3 L* [, i) h- e1 H/ L; K

晶晶

回覆 晶晶 的文章

※雖然站在當媽的立場，會是支持當媽的，但不得不佩服當爸的急智！※

大頭

但 這樣判給爸爸 好像也不合理吧

晶晶

回覆 大頭 的文章

. f& M& }9 K+ f' q+ g: V好像也是哦！

lilian6425

喔 我笑翻了  謝謝晶晶這麼棒的分享

Arch

這個爸爸真是反應機敏啊!!

阿慌

人畢竟不是機器
原料與加工過的成品不同