- UID
- 69
- 閱讀權限
- 35
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 3
- 貢獻
- 1086
- 活力
- 19
- 金幣
- 2190
- 日誌
- 0
- 記錄
- 0
- 最後登入
- 2016-2-3
 
- 文章
- 672
- 在線時間
- 314 小時
|
本文章最後由 frank 於 2010-10-12 10:16 編輯
; @5 F* j0 ?) R/ p6 i4 D# U' A$ S9 [. h/ F
關於窄頻雷射治療鼻子過敏,我個人感覺還滿有效的,建議大家可以試試看,當然,也有人完全沒效,不過,有沒有效,試了才知道,而且沒有什麼副作用,而且又免費,嘿嘿! 建議大家可以試試看! # J I9 H0 P8 ~+ C* Y
對了,若是因為鼻息肉或鼻竇炎所引發的鼻塞或鼻子不適,還是要先將這些問題處理完,再做這雷射治療,因為以目前我看到的文獻,並沒有以此類方式治療鼻息肉或鼻竇炎的文獻,引用一份文獻和各位分享 :
+ Q: Y. ~9 A9 l |: h原始期刊報告:Neuman I, Finkelstein Y. Narrow-band red light phototherapy in perennial allergic rhinitis and nasal polyposis. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. 1997, 78: 399–406. 窄頻紅光光線療法對治療慢性過敏性鼻炎及鼻息肉症的效果,過敏、氣喘及免疫學期刊(美國)。4 L1 |7 F. E4 }9 A' T8 ?0 n
) J! {+ s% d0 B8 X, _& H過敏性鼻炎是所有免疫球蛋白E-中介性過敏反應中最常見之疾病,有高達30﹪的兒童及成人深受其害。患者一般接受包括抗組織胺、減充血劑、局部或全身類固醇、噴鼻液、鼻噴劑、異丙托溴銨或減敏治療等治療,儘管被普遍採用,但面對可能產生的併發症或後遺症,治療上還是不太理想。! X- Q- d, C3 Z* t
# t/ F5 [% m. q3 F2 N, e% E低能量窄頻紅光光線療法已經成功運用在許多醫學治療領域中,其中660 nm的紅光照射已被證實能抑制血液中活性氧生成,並影響Ca2+的移轉。由於過敏症狀有相當大的部分起因於活性氧的生成與Ca2+的移轉,因此嘗試用660 nm紅光治療過敏性鼻炎症狀患者。
% p& c4 n7 p+ d
$ r+ P; j, s: n6 e, ~研究共收納實驗組(使用660nm紅光照射)50位、對照組(假光照射)29位的慢性過敏性鼻炎患者,部分患者合併有支氣管性氣喘。過敏性鼻炎以鼻癢、流鼻水、打噴嚏、鼻塞以及相關症狀作為判斷,每位病患並接受皮膚戳刺檢查確認過敏反應。罹患鼻竇炎及鼻竇異常者則不納入。3 u$ ?9 F7 J" I' N. l
* R) q6 O) T; ~' W) d7 E, E5 w5 c
本研究採雙盲、隨機與平行試驗的方式進行,每位患者接受660nm紅光或假光照射治療,每天3次、每次4.4分鐘(光能量1焦耳)共14天。在光療期間病患不得服用其他藥物,治療結果依病患主觀改善程度及醫師鼻內視鏡檢查結果作為評斷。
a- r) y ~& X( I3 S; `
- c* C" l8 m. f結果顯示,以660nm紅光照射治療後,有80﹪患者的鼻塞症狀、81﹪患者的流鼻水狀況獲得改善。由鼻內視鏡檢查則發現,61%的鼻塞狀況、65﹪的流鼻水症狀以及48%的中鼻甲水腫症狀獲得改善;至於鼻搔癢、及咳嗽(鼻後滴漏)症狀的病患主觀感受到改善的比例分別為60﹪、70﹪及69﹪。
4 m9 _ d9 r" s# c/ W
: @7 N$ `7 A% I- j而照射假光的過敏性鼻炎患者,在鼻塞、流鼻水、鼻搔癢、頭痛及咳嗽症狀上的病患主觀改善率分別為31%、14%、32%、20%及21%。鼻內視鏡檢查在鼻塞、流鼻水、中鼻甲水腫的改善率則為21%、7%及12%。" ~; a% u! U: L9 A' \
. \( s& R8 C! s# X e總和評估以660nm紅光治療過敏性鼻炎症狀,在主觀感受上有72%的病患認為有效,在鼻內視鏡檢查中顯現對70%的病患有效;在假光組則為24%及21%。% e" L! `8 ?7 W F( R I" l
* [' @: z& ~. F. y0 Y
◎660nm紅光對改善過敏性鼻炎症狀的治療效果(n=50)1 y+ S( i u: t$ x4 Z6 k% z* q
3 ~4 V9 [" Z7 d原始文獻:
% A# f9 o+ B( z# w3 c% m" aBACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis and nasal polyposis are common nasal diseases, but the available treatment modalities have only limited success. OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic effect of low-energy narrow-band red light phototherapy on nasal clinical symptoms of allergic rhinitis and nasal polyposis. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized prospective study, 50 patients with allergic rhinitis and 10 with nasal polyposis received intranasal illumination at 660 nm for 4.4 minutes three times a day for 14 days (total dose 6 joules per day). Twenty-nine rhinitic patients and one patient with polyposis received equivalent sham illumination as placebo. Evaluation was based on symptom scores and a clinical assessment that included pre-treatment and post-treatment videotaped rigid and flexible nasendoscopy. RESULTS: Following treatment, improvement of symptoms was reported by 72% of the allergic rhinitis patients and objective improvement was endoscopically demonstrated in 70% of them as compared with 24% and 3%, respectively, in the placebo group. These differences were significant. No improvement was obtained in any of the patients with polyposis. CONCLUSIONS: Allergic rhinitis, if uncomplicated by polyps or chronic sinusitis, can be effectively treated by narrow-band red light illumination of the nasal mucosa at 660 nm, with marked alleviation of clinical symptoms. Whenever possible, candidates for phototherapy should be selected by endoscopic examination.
& |) {, M' |1 `: [& A0 Z
- K- g' U9 E3 _9 |1 Z$ \8 Q4 K中文部分原始出處 |
|