- UID
- 11613
- 閱讀權限
- 40
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 3
- 貢獻
- 2444
- 活力
- 7274
- 金幣
- 34538
- 日誌
- 4
- 記錄
- 0
- 最後登入
- 2020-2-16
  
- 文章
- 812
- 在線時間
- 543 小時
|
本帖最後由 synchris 於 2013-4-17 16:48 編輯
& v; w" o) K: h! U' c* Jrainbow 發表於 2013-4-16 21:40 ; i, Y( E, G1 }, Q; j& o2 V
大概是我表達不夠清楚9 R* e2 D! M% a/ @" J l/ e# ~
在學術界常常發生一種現象 大家同時思考一個問題到達瓶頸
7 l0 b# k( u0 Z- a0 C! }2 S許多人都知道突破點快到 ... ' ~- F6 y3 o6 f3 A. R
7 P- V! w% H4 H% ~3 u
Well, as this essay reports:
& N' u" D, O0 ^- t% U- I L9 `# v8 _
Quote8 e9 I7 M/ P3 p& x. I& p4 o! T
8 O/ I$ F! k: H4 ?: q& s# j
With her insight and original data, Rosalind Franklin would have been the most likely person
4 L1 {' P, _9 p1 }$ C l; g+ y$ c" a2 t5 r% v0 l
who would have solved the strucutre of DNA
. t4 m( g h$ S
; S8 y8 d+ A) a+ B/ J8 T( i. M8 R4 Rif Watson and Crick had not seen her data and come up with the model first.* q- Q* z0 s6 g Y. {
% L$ J l3 G4 w0 u* aunquote
2 ~: v$ c6 ?3 x+ @% T x4 L! R9 X) F9 t4 L5 J& H
$ R1 \3 V, B' l( ]' R2 \
The concept of IPR wass not popular 60 years ago and hence not a matter course as it is in 21st century, / \, J' }6 j7 s3 r! x5 Z
# A9 r) M& |3 L/ Mtherefore I add some question marks at the end of that sentence.
0 e) `3 M' a. h# w% i) @ {, Z# Z) W( j" |! J
What if Watson and Crick had not seen Franklin's data? Would they still publish their results in the same time
6 M' j' I! |9 P' y% C
# U0 c( O" I, {' v2 pframe?9 U' l) n7 B% y) B% i
7 o, ?/ d, `& |2 h: j/ lIt's a big pity that it's true Watson and Crick DID see Rosalind's data and 9 r$ h& R# r+ f* G4 `' v/ s: m6 _
! {9 m4 K& Q$ `7 Q7 fthat Franklin could not live long enough to prove it to the world that she is the most likely person ..........
6 j& y" g2 ~1 P( I, {7 G: W" {, P' O! ^" ^6 T6 |& ]
My purpose is more to introduce Franklin than to negate Watson and Crick.
7 ?# k8 E3 t; O; Y6 |! b- \) F- I Z) j9 M+ s# ^8 X6 `6 E
誠然 許多重要的發現 是社會集智累積的成果
* O) s* R- W0 ?, r8 y6 N' e" F; x7 `5 a) P: `0 t
也有很多是因美麗的錯誤使然0 L- W: V& r( R4 {) e- x4 D# D
9 T6 |' c6 n; H3 }% |
因緣所生法 佛說即是空+ x: M0 u- f2 A, a
7 ]+ B* A2 h# g9 K
因之 我們無法見證與過去事實相反的假設能否成真# t- P+ M! S( }; d1 L3 ]: x7 I3 _/ A" T
5 ^# b0 T2 C" _, w z
感謝您的用心指導 我虛心受教了 |
|