- UID
- 2319
- 閱讀權限
- 40
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 3
- 貢獻
- 3294
- 活力
- 55
- 金幣
- 7294
- 日誌
- 0
- 記錄
- 4
- 最後登入
- 2024-10-18
- 文章
- 1672
- 在線時間
- 618 小時
|
平民 發表於 2012-12-24 11:56 - r+ b! e/ e& `: }8 Q
某些人自以為很瞭解狗,我實在很想聽聽看翻譯過後的狗話,究竟是狗想的?還是人以為的?
7 ^$ ~7 e; O }; l# z z( v4 H, U老實講,發文的問題,無 ...
# {0 P; C! L* F. } r6 q你的意見如下:「某些人自以為很瞭解狗,我實在很想聽聽看翻譯過後的狗話,究竟是狗想的?還是人以為的?」0 T$ ~& K3 G6 ] K" Y
我把你的意見解構(decompose)如下:
- y _0 C9 i2 q1.人的語言可以翻譯成狗的語言。 V& ?# [3 F+ ^" o
2.翻譯後的語言,無法確定是人的還是狗的意見。/ v U s) l+ B1 i2 p) ~
我的說明如下:" y) W0 k R* P( |
按:語言由「文字、語法、結構邏輯」組成,在性質上則有「productivity, recursivity, and displacement等」的不同。
& p& K8 Q3 U0 H1 i2 w按WIKI的資料顯示,人的語言與狗的語言不同,狗的語言沒有文字,也沒有動詞、名詞、介系詞,也沒有結構邏輯等等等,在性質上也有很大的不同。有些語言學家(linguist)甚至認為,狗無所謂的語言。0 f' S. N7 u6 w5 z1 Z6 d& N! T- Q
綜上:8 G4 S, P. r4 h: B7 ~
1.人的語言無法翻譯成狗的語言。因此,你的假設是錯誤的。) x9 Z! g: j: C5 n! K4 g
2.因為無法翻譯,所以沒有你所謂的翻譯後的狗語言,也因此沒有是人的或是狗的意見的問題。( ^3 g( |2 d$ w* x/ y
關於人的語言的特性以及與動物語言的差別請參考:9 X" t# _: X0 ~
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language
7 O7 Z4 b# r: b% X! E% R2 x: O n+ C摘要如下:
7 c/ X( q( H3 oHuman language is unique because has the properties of productivity, recursivity, and displacement, and because it relies entirely on social convention and learning. Its complex structure therefore affords a much wider range of possible expressions and uses than any known system of animal communication. Language is thought to have originated when early hominins started gradually changing their primate communication systems, acquiring
% ^7 w( D1 f, S: T# z' Z1 vthe ability to form a theory of other minds and a shared intentionality.
8 f! V* p! H6 S9 |6 z! i/ D關於狗的語言以及某些linguist認為沒有所謂狗的語言的文章請參考:: V5 I( G8 w# |& n! p3 l$ I
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_language# d% k5 T# W6 o. \9 P0 S- G
摘要如下:
2 L; u, H* j6 h' j" d$ z MAnimal language is the modeling of human language in non human animal systems. While the term is widely used, researchers agree that animal languages are not as complex or expressive as human language.
/ O' \& h2 k8 ?8 s3 j- B. oSome researchers including the linguist Charles Hockett, who proposed a list of design features of Human Language, argue that there are significant differences separating human language from animal communication even at its most complex, and that the underlying principles are not related.[1] Accordingly, Thomas A. Sebeok has proposed not to use the term 'language' in case of animal sign systems.
# _9 m% h8 S. Z0 Z% a( AOthers argue that an evolutionary continuum exists between the communication methods these animals use and human language. Examining this continuum could help explain how humanity evolved its incredibly sophisticated proficiency for language." e4 D6 b: ?$ d' q
|
|