meikuo2002 發表於 2011-3-13 01:13 * }5 O b0 t9 N
身處地震帶的台灣人一定要看，也要跟周圍我們所愛的人講喔！
- x& D4 W. x* ]' v# y" V! Y) Q謝謝樓主分享哦& d+ u4 r. \* b3 y. n* }, F
很有用的資訊~~作者: yinsheng6451 時間: 2011-3-13 05:13
文字+圖解真的很詳細~謝謝分享ㄛ作者: powerme 時間: 2011-3-15 13:26
「生命三角」的避難方式近年來在網路上流傳很廣，但地震時可不可以躲在桌下，這點其實是很有爭議性的，目前台灣、日本、和美國官方的防災訓練，仍教育民眾要躲在桌下。 + |& Z8 ^2 w$ i& ~& U3 }; M / h! Z3 t" [' L& u7 u9 L' U9 ?8 c維基百科中的Triangle of Life條目（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_Life ），裡面有關於生命三角避難法的批評，節錄部分如下：+ S: P% b4 l: I: B2 a6 `
2 g/ \7 I+ N+ T4 N# v7 C7 |' G
According to United States Geological Survey, the Triangle of Life is a misguided idea about the best location a person should try to occupy during an earthquake.[10] Critics have argued that it is actually very difficult to know where these triangles will be formed, as objects (including large, heavy objects) often move around during earthquakes. It is also argued that this movement means that lying beside heavy objects is very dangerous.[11] Statistical studies of earthquake deaths show most injuries/deaths occur due to falling objects, not structures. Also, given that there are no warnings for earthquakes, you are more likely to be injured trying to move during an earthquake rather than immediately seeking a doorway, furniture, or near an interior wall. This strategy, combined with good engineering and educated search and rescue teams is the safest. The Triangle of Life theory encourages individuals to put themselves at far higher risk by seeking safe zones which they are unlikely to reach.# u* o. W2 S+ j2 u) F) {
" q% z. d5 n0 L( \6 f Y' DMahdavifar et al. (2010) analyzed and compared both methods in detail, considering their application, the extent of people who are under the coverage, simplicity in transferring concepts, and the probability of reducing casualties and damage in developing countries such as Iran. Based on the results and observations, they concluded that duck and cover is still regarded as a better option for people during an earthquake.[12]3 Y2 B' ~/ B0 a
* }5 O b0 t9 N
